jonamo_cat

01:24 am: from the hill
thoughts do not compete against eachother

they just arise as sequences, and are acted upon through changing levels of the feelings associated with those sequences

their are aesetics of thought, and can prioritise this, as a master control feeling, that resides over the mixing of sequences, such that the charecters of the sequence cohere to its rule (or the rule, logic)

even this process ammounts only to thought however

and the process towards action can not be assumed to follow from it

logic is an aesetic perogative, one of silence from within a system,

the production of systems however, requires action, and usually noise, feeling

i want to start a commune at sea

in a floating bubble

filled with plants

and outside of the infringement of my rights

05:31 pm: hume3=dynamics of the will to power
the relaionships within these impressions, which are to some extent evident from our experience of them, collectively...and mixing together, sharing a spectrum, and so on

these relationships, which, bestow the power to concieve of space and matter to presently conscious entities and minds...

....this relationship, which ammounts to will to power, to 1=1, which we either deny is explicitly performed by god, or affirm at least that there is a science, allbeit an unknowable one, if we fail in attempting to know it.....

......we must non-the-less attempt to uncover!


we acknowledge the need for ideas, and that there may be degrees of complexity within ideas,

we acknowledge impressions, and the elaborate relations of simple impressions such that accompany our ideas....

we seek the simplest of ideas, and we seek, the origin of ideas, while containing sequences of impressions, the arrangment of these sequences, and there seperation into specific wholes, we must discover a science

we already see that matter and space are ideas, as as a sequence, they would be binary, extending in a multitude of dimensions, and said dimensions would have no means to establish themselves out of this basic opposition, and certanily no way of cutting into this sequence, to establish a point wherin the mind of the individual resides, or percieves itself to reside

we see this opposition as two balencing sides of the remainder of a simpler idea, the idea of 1=1, we thus begin from the individual point of reference, and have no need to atempt to find a way to force it in later

but for this point to have the properties which we acknowledge it to have, such as its surrounding dimensions, we must assert that the point is in a relationship with simple impressions, that is, qualities, capable through their differences, to allow for the construction of the complex, using this point, as theiir centre, thus the 1=1 eminates from itself, in spheres of awarness, that carry along with themselves, in addition to the relationship of the qualities, and the remaining impression of them, a remainder, which sets the form of the extension within the sphere as being finite, and structured in terms of past and future, space-time,

more complexly, it is the contents of these spheres, as a remainder, as structural, that is the overall relationship of all 1=1 s within an assumed largest sphere, which is known as father sky, and the relationship of all 1=1 s with all other 1=1 s that is the form of the monad

we have asserted however already that while relationships on a large, complex scale take place between these seperate wholes of the monad, that the monad requires the relationship of qualities to bring it about....

concievably, it is the relationship itself that also brings about the remainder, but this is the question, as the remainder is that which relates 1=1 to infinity, and produces mater and space as extended finites to unify the imbalence between 1 and infinity, to place 1 within a system, that is within an infinity and yet hide infinity behind his veil by making the remainder a simple mater of the motion of mater within space, that we percieve as change

all of this when put i relation of monad to monad ammount to infinities relating to one another

but this takes place, on the basis, of first becoming 1, and entering into 1=1 which produces the remainder, which masks infinity, and allows us to experience the specific portion, or rather, the infinite set that we are, in relation to other infinite sets, as abstracted from infinity

ofcourse in this way, infinity itself is an abstraction, which only exists as sets, which interact with eachother, through the monad

the premis for a set being divided out, being carved out, into the monad, as existing, remains some higher quality of qualities themselves

it requires some realtion of parts and wholes, some formation and containment of an ALL, that all monads then share

the premiss of 1=1 that emerges spontaneously, or rather, through the science which we are atempting to investigate, out of the monads themselves, into more monads.....not from the monads, but from the remainders, which possess qualities, and have them worked upon, by the chaos of interacting infinite sets

so while, whatever the premiss is, which first came about, to produce a first monad, a basic infinity, by acting upon itself it produced further sets of infinty which cut thru it,

eyes through the remainders, an emergence, akin to insanity

however the first, is not the prime debate, but rather, the debate is the principles of the qualities that gives rise to the 1=1

which i assert is some kind of ALLism of which basic qualities are parts, and ammount to a basic whole

the second part of the debate is then how from working upon the remainders which are infinitie's mask, new sets emerge, by the remainders being pressed back into a state of wholeness, (something akin to sex)


phew(for now)


(see how the blue sky flees the night, leaving only water and flesh behind)

04:48 pm: hume2=kant+narrative(ie a distraction for my ego)
all elements of simple impressions, all simple impressions, put in sequence, are ideas

all sequences, can become ideas, so long as the sequences are repeated....

......we must allow ourselves to believe in simple ideas.......

.........to lead to complex ideas....


and at present i believe the simplest idea is of the past and future.....and of matter and space(kant)

or even, some neccessary impression, which is a crucial ingredient to ideas
senses are the source of impressions
im thinking werther the past future relationship is one of the simplest ideas
or if it is a crucial impression in formin ideas
kant talk sabout this, more to do with time and space in general
and asserts that we have an idea, that isnt bassed on impressions
that comes before them
that allows for all other ideas to emerge
the APRIORI dahdah

, so , how , from the innate apriori 1=1 we could invent our idea of the past and future, as well as space and matter, as a remainder that falls out of the sequence, when we apply to it, the formula of our present self extended, in the 1=1

this does seem to make an unfortunate ammount of sense

otherwise we depend upon impressions of space, and impressions of matter, and how can we attempt to describe or even bring our minds to confront these ideas, with out them coming logicaly from the relationships of phenoumena? and hence being abstract remainders of our 1=1 will to power of the extended present

we....could still establish that the 1=1 is the basic most idea, and that space and matter are its consequencial complex ideas....

to do this, we assert something beyond mere sequences of impressions

we assert something generative within the substance of impressions, that, is capable of transforming the relation of those substances....

we assert against the innate, as we must allow for the generation of the principle, allow it to escape itself as will to power, escape whatever 1=1 it has possessed, thru always possessing a remainder, and the distilation of this remainder, back into the primicay, and back into new expressions of the will to power, new 1=1 s , that differ from the "first"(preceeding)


(it is terms that are allowed to settle, and therefore concepts that solidify them when they do so, a term will be pushed, by an aristocracy such as a conceptualiser, into being suitable for becoming a solid part of their concepts, however, coming to my own terms, i am capable of transcending these concepts, and where i have fire, you have a rupture in your solid surface, like the contenental drift, concepts drift, many earthquakes, but fewer volcanic eruptions....earthquakes are the strugle between concepts, as there are a multiplicity of them, erruptions however, are the terms themselves, resting upon eternal possabilities of extendedable pressence, actualy passing higher into the infinite) where now should we look for this ominous smoke? and in what city shall the eruption occur? and how devistating this new layer of life will appear to those who have dug in bena=eathe it, and how fresh and fertile to those who inherit it...for its own given time...or else...become a wilderness of lush greens, that floods with life, and animal fire, which eludes directly to the next coming erruption

smoke makes night come in the middle of the day, and the when the earth allows it, the sun may once more break through, and see itself again in our newly polished mirror

Tags: essay

04:30 pm: impression and idea of self (hume1)
in answer to humes statement of there being no impression of the self,

all impressions are of the self, and the impression that grows within you, which transforms your impressions into more complex relations, which is to say, your ideas, are your self, in relation to a multitude of diverse impressions

if all that is lacking is a unifier, to order this multitude, and hence be the impression of the self, itself, it is the present

all impressions and ideas of impressions share the charecter of being present,

our impression of the present

IS

our impression of self

07:19 pm: part1 of the unrain
i made a gesture, but it didnt swim, it sank, and lingered for a time on my flesh, until i swallowed my will. I was recovered of my passion, and now a new will, a mere aesthetic judgement, grew out from the rocks of the walls of my well, and i could not swallow. It was unuterrable, un swallowable, and out of hand. I sought to sweep myself away, and resolved to fix my gaze, for relief, from in my despiration my eyes had glared all arround, and with every breath i was soaking up my sour roundings like sponge.

Where i was seated came to life, came to fabric, and colour, and morphing shapes disguised as comfort. I leapt up. but could not touch anything, i wished to drink, but had no taste to, milk and nightmares. My jaw locked, and breathing through my nose i made the move to leave the house, out the back, but too fast, and as soon as i reached the pavement, i slowed. I had chosen to go left, and so i did, walking, in the un-rain.

10:50 pm: primeary binarey
it is right that all things be questioned then,

that we may choose what and exactly what to assert, what to deffend, and have knowledge of our freedom to do this, so as we can aspire to whichever heaven we believe,

the way of things established from before the root of all sublimations, is thereby open, and not only to its seeds of the sublime, but to the mutations, as well, as, the depth beyond the sublime


that our world is found laughable finds us busy at work upon boundless joy

that we are considered fools finds us capable of great humour


feats of laughter, one could not believe to flow from a mortal

we are too close to ourselves to feel trapped by any situation,

and yet we do not fear self deffence, are pleased when others seek to attack, for in attacking us, will hear their tuning forks sound as they are...

we do offer nothing, and deliver only our own space, for the transformations that it is capable,


whos words shall encourage all wills?

shall set itself into relation with the will itself,

how might it do so?

by making the will the basis of the world, and of all action,

or that which does the opposite

it is not I that possessess will, but the world that is will, which, possesing I, will...s

do you see the totality of reflection, dischordant, one on one, stemming from a scale of change, and pulsing, in many directions, into many other scales, strung back arround, and back into the primal scale....

.....that is how we slip....and sleep...from out of our extended hour, of figurd formal finite curves and flowering powers, we bloom back to the first sets desire to pulse on ever newly wed powers...

primal heart beat slows, as time fills ever, more multiply grows, while time spurs time, until limits become known, and rise above, now as one, now are sown

2,6,4,2,5,2,4,2,2,1,4,1,2,2,4,2,5,2,4,6,2

2,3,5,7,

primary binary?

11:14 pm: will3power
the will to pwer is that sequence of wills, in its place, which is broken open, by its energies and seperate wills having previously come together, but now exceeding their relationship towards eachother....

having sustained the creature, there now overflows a particular will, that has upon itself the awareness and possition to make nought of all which has previously been life, and harness the maximum of its particular energy../activity

capable of looking down upon the whole of life, in the face of how far it exceeds in its one or more particular appitite(s) what is merely neccessary for it to have come about

ofcourse the usual will to achieve supremecy is sex, and this is no surprise from any point of view

but ofcourse for one will to become the resevoir whilst the others simply meet its means, and giving life its energy, and charecter....it is concievable that any will could become the potentialy fruitfull one....tho...


remains the question of a resevoir becoming fruitfull, which i believe is the question nietzsche attempts to adress...

and then also the question of the banks and possition, and pit, of the resvoir to begin with....

...how anything is pooled at all...and what it is that becomes pooled, and in what way...to what end/action

08:02 pm: inversion of the object as/is the object
the 3rd Set relies upon an ordering of the 1st Set that goes beyond any estimatio n of the 2nd Set

in other words

the supposed infinities of the quantities of the 2nd set, are less great than the reality which allows their fabrication

the order within the first set, is such that its properties are capable of manifestation within any specific finite set...

the 2nd set is therefore, only the attempt at producing to infinity a reproduction of the ordering of all which is within the first set....

ie....Set2 is the continued production of finite reflections of ttthe ultimate order, of Set3,

Set1 is therefore a reflected piece of Set2, which is a reflection of the parts of Set3

all reflections are ultimately taking place within Set3....but are inverted twice by reflections 2 and 1....

1 is equal to 3 but only in part....whilst 2 is a different mechanism, that operates primarily upon the dimensional mechanism of things, abstracting from the raw material present to sets 1 and 3, but doing so as a funtion of increasing and expanding upon the ratios....

constructing withinand out-of Set3, Set2-sequences, which possess Set1 bodies, which have their consistency thru the embodiment of Set3 properties

the grand metaphysical body, being poorly copied, giving rise to multiplicity, which continues to interact with itself with the metaphysical body, but also, as the material, of the copying, as rudimentary sequences

there is a clear pressence of the nature of the object, as inversion of the All, as how things appear from Set2

07:32 pm: dimension and infinity
anything relative can be suppossed to infinity, and yet, what reason do we have to at this point dismiss the relativity of whatever is being considered?

we therefore concieve, ludicrously, of relating infinities, these relatable infinities are our monads

they are the grounds of objectivity

yet

the meaning of their coming about, in specific collaberation, exhibiting themselves as finites, and sets of finites, and specific objects

does not reveal itself as an ultimate sequence, as even the real sequence of elements is a finite chunk, an apperence dressed up in the wear of infinity....

....but, dismissing the infinity alone as ultimate, requiring the neccessity of finite grounds for the ultimate....

...we begin to see that the shadow of the infinite, the ending, and also the potential repetition of a particular sequence, out from the infinite, to the finite, and then through whole sets of infinities, something else, is the true bearing of meaning within the play of extension...

out from a sequence (which would have been potentialy infinite) accumulates a gravity, and not merely a gravity towards the sequence as a describable mathamatical phenoumena, the description is rather not the gravity either, for a potnetial varience overides, whereby the sequence may alter along a path, that, remains true to the gravity therin, but differes from another possability, with different description, and differently unfolding gravity, and outtwards force

^

I refer here in some way to the conception of paralel worlds being possible under the laws of science, tho not neccessarily truely existing of themselves, there is some neccessary factor that ties our own present to this particular causal chain....

this is the property of the present which supercedes all dimensions of extension of partticular objects....and IS the meaningfullness of our reality


this present is both centre and not centre of the bearing of all forms of extension, as it is both present in the appearence of the centre, and in the transformation of the centre and the progression of the whole object


parralel dimensions might be said to exist without pressence, and here we havve a paradox, for the expression of the slipperyness of pressence equated with existence....by suppossing hypothetical pressentlessness.....
///yet we already suppose the possabilitty of unknown pressence/non-personal pressence, with the existence of other minds...

however we allow, for pressence, no restraints upon its ability to interact with other pressence....and so the re-alignment of minds...and re-alignment of other worlds back into one are allowed for...and here we see karma, as the potential of the individual to come in and out of this additional capacity, this particular dimension, of pressence...

and define karma as multiplicity within ones own pressence

and see that this multiplicity is a complicated arrangment of the same relational bodies that we have already suppossed to infinity, as seperate monads, whereby, the world is a multiplicity of objects....and the centre has specific properties to exert, rather than the absolute exertion of a centre that is non-specific....

a wave front, which works at maintaining itself/recuring, vs, the wave-ness...but, we also are aware, that every wave front, is possessed by an infinity of its own, but faces in the finite, its own potential oblivion, as well as the conceptual move away from infinity, as expanse, and into simple mutation

not throwing pearls to swine, is to not take something as it is exhibited to infinity, and exhibit it as a reflection, as repitition, which, reduces context, making, indigestable the whole, and instead, chewed upon, and mixed, certain parts....as sex, partial repitition and mutation.....

that sex has its place at the begining of things, is the sign that the world itself is fragmented partial reflections of what truly is, reproduced, mutated, taken out of context, and yet, held to the standard, ultimately, of the origional context...partly masquerading as god...and All...

and yet, when the object comes about, when it reveals itself, it destroys itself through sex, the musical theme injects itself, with its heightened power, out and into the absurd divergence of states which surrounds it...

self-consciousness demands repatition, repatition demands either love or sex, love amidst the parts, or sex from within the whole

the whole upon acknowledging and acting upon the external, begets irony, reveals inconsistency...its gravity, ultimately will be overcome, in every way imaginable...for beter and worse...

the sex, of the octave, is one of the basic mysteries, the procreation, and production of the multiplicity, the 7OR12 offspring that preceded causal time and the chain of adam....

the ratios of extension, from which dimensions are constructed

upon the crystals of the cave there traced the same line day after day, where illuminated by the pressence of the sun, chambers of light cast beems and moons and waves of shining dawn, that diverted rippled across all sides, begining from arround and leading against the innermost line of reflection across a dance upon the walls, that leapt to and fro, sometimes touching, doubeling trippeling, and then some, first straight thru the spine, and then in all limbs dancing and climbing deeper and deeper laughing into the deapths of the cave the dynamicaly embodied sun ran

07:16 pm: geom
the simple object, which, as an allgebraical unit, can be put thru transformations of certain types, can be taken through one dimension, or another, alone, and by itself


the spiral is the product of dimensions of extension being tied together, looped, as a recuring sequence of basic inputs, each taken through the dimension, from interior to exterior, or visa versa, and each in its own unique direction

the motion of the spiral, and the dimensional lines of extension drawn through it, do not approach the centre directly, even to infinity, the lines do not meet but are tangents of the spiral, each at a seperate point.....

....ie, an infinately small shape, still has a finite set of points, the points of the shape never meet, even "at infinity" it is rather that the particular shape is capable of possessing its own unique infinity, with its own unique potentials

07:05 pm: art is an object, through intergrated dimensions of transformation, upon a basic quality,
being operated upon by a set of ratios of qualities


the 1st Set, contains several sub-sets, begining with one for each of the senses, but then within each sub-set, within each sense, there are complementary qualities, seperate sets of information, that possess a dimensional property towards the co-sets of their sub-set, and many of these are analogous to others within the sub-sets of the seperate senses.

for example, brightness may be analogous to pitch, boldness to volume, etc

and while we can not compare the two senses directly, we can compare the dimension of the effect upon the central phenoumena

and so just as there can be dimension to a visual event, so too can there be to an audible event, or a bouquete,

these dimensions are understood, through a subject-object relationship, the extension of these dimensions, and their proliferation (pro-life-ration), is the knowledge of the mind-body, the past and future, and where this proliferation is percieved, so is an object also percieved,

thru the maniuplation of the second order set, and its construction, into dimensionality, thru the manipulation of the finite ratios, that appear upon the infinite scale

the dimension created by the infinite alone, the dimension of the scale, would be the suppossed spiral, in music where octaves bend the infinate progress thru enough dimensions, while limited to a finite set of actual notes, the dimension grows insanely, as a spiral

the dimensions, as they press upon the quality of the set, form the qualities, order and bind them together, in line with the operation of the dimensional surgery to move the impression into the centre of an "object" and then out again, through its own centrality, its own construction exerts itself over all that has countered it, in making it central, the central expression then exerts itself, tragically as object, as supreme law, outwardly, and away from itself, upon its dependents, and shattering the dimensions which had centralised it, dissolving/explodingg into darkness, receeding into pure aether, leaving only the dimensional trace of its reality, lingering, and crowning it, imortal, dynamic, and once again of infinite sides, and possabilities

06:27 pm: IMPORTANT
1st Set, for each sense there is a set of qualities, as a spectrum or specific number of qualities
(this is the first set which we will call the metaphysical set, or qualia set)

2nd Set, within the world of objects there is a set of quantity, as ratio or relative arrangements of the qualities of the 1st set
(this is the materio-causal set, or geometric set)


there is no limit upon the comparasum of these two sets, each is in one way or another infinate, and the comparasum between them is also infinate

in fact

any observations of the second set are carried out to whatever end by reason, but appear as a third set, which is an attempt upon the arrangement of the 1st set

09:26 pm: the structure has its centre
every word building towards something, every brick set, and keapt in place, first by action, then by will....

....expecting a revolution?


no....for not....not for knot, in every heart...stones seem to me to go unturned....so it seems to me.....


where snakes hide...

....try as we might.....


a simple philosophy, and a wise man might say, first take actions to coax out the snake

another man says with the law as his lever, this stick brings me great moments, and keeps the snakes at bay


a straight line, thru a curved space


the builders, shake the ground, wake the snake and give him pay, he turns over his own stone, imediately

07:15 pm: not of matter but of space
singular explosion chaining flowers into space
as chains loose matter sails across infinities surface
for in dreams of multiplicity there spreads a smile of emptiness
and towards the singularity draws a frown of great suspense
wearing crowns of distance
eminating waves of circumstance
still we bloom with radiance as we embrace the great expanse
and still yet we sigh with longing as we reflect upon the future's banks
cradled by dissent we dance wishing well towards our pasts as they drown, or swim along, the watery expanse

03:02 pm: the yogi placebo
A yogi went to a great master and asked the master to teach him how to sop smoking hash.

He said "master, i have tried everything. I tried to smoke as much hash as i can, have tried reducing my smoking so that i can get more high, i have tried stopping altogether to eliminate the need and get limitlessly high, but neither way do i feel right, and all ways i end up ultimately smoking more, and getting less high. What should i do master? should i smoke no more, or smoke a particular ammount?"

THE MASTER SAID
Do not smoke, but at all times keep near you the means to smoke, and if you feel the need to do so, make the preparations, and bring here to me the joints before you smoke them, for my inspection

04:53 am: a joke (a bad one)
dont confuse the past and the future

you see despite the fact that there is no difference between the two some people still find a way to confuse them

and while they agree that they are both the same, say that there is difference in one, but not in the other

03:17 am: 333 life on the inside, vs, hooks as wings
No matter at what stage in history, wherever one pushes for rights, one is right-wing, whenever one pushes for duties, left-wing.

Upon pushing for a firm foundation however, between the two, one is neither, or one is both.

And if successful, you not only allow for both to grow alongside eachother, but also for them to break apart from eachother, and begin again, at any point, with a new right, on new ground, towards a whole new set of duties, or even to stay dead, and free, dutyless, with each right seperate from the other, and your whole world tended to, as if all of creation where one great tree of life itself.

As for now however, one can be called a communist for believing in equal rights for the poor, simply because others would be forced to make it possible, and to make it their duty to get the poor their rights. So skewed is the foundation, the capital, of our society, in favour of one group of people. So too it was when the majority of the world's monarchies where crushed and overthrown, they had impossed upon them a great incomprehensible measure of duties, in the face of giving the people just rights. But these rights are primary, and of highest importance, I say this, adressing you from the far far right, we all deserve certain rights, and whoever has made it their dealing to control all of the worlds wealth, all of the worlds ressources, these capitalist kings, they ought prepare for an influx of duties that would make the revolutions of old seem like spilled milk.

It is not I who has made duties of these things, not I who has made duties of these enviromental laws, not I who has made taxes like a plague, it is the corpse of the old world, and that life, stronger than I, and strongest of all, still survives, despite all of the injustice, despite all of the war, and despite all of the tyrany, murder, and theft. And still it is not life that has made these duties, but life that is in the right, and the shadow of murder and theft that has made these duties, and i seek their end as much as anyone,

BUT I KNOW WHICH SIDE LIFE IS ON

02:11 am: INTRODUCTION
"I'm not political."
"Not political....or non-political?" The man looked up as he heard the question, less bored than before, but only slightly, certainly not interested, but from a compulsion to understand had become confussed enough to ask. His companion had afterall seemed to twinkle with mania as if the question where a knife in his hands, reflecting some bright light in all directions, as he twisted it to and fro, trying to dissern how to cut this morsel of intellect, and just how appertising it might soon reveal itself to be.
"What's the difference?" He asked, with only the briefest glance at the man's eye.
"The difference, is, you either believe in the concept of Rights, or the concept of Duties, hold one, perhaps to be higher than the other, or else you believe in a particular relationship between them, and have ideas about what that relationship is, about where it is..or else....you do not."
"Don't want?"
"Don't believe that such a relationship exists, nor any real or remarkable foundation for it."
"...and which is which?"
"That, is not important, but do you believe...?..in a foundation..for this, relationship? Or perhaps simply in the dominion of one over the other, of Rights above Duties, or Duties over Rights? Do you believe?" He thought about it for a second, and decided not to choose a side.
"I don't really think about it, I certainly don't believe in any foundation for the relationship, but I can see why some people would want to impose their rights, and others try and impose more and more duties on people."
"Yes, well.." The man looked upset. "The disbelief over the foundation is what would make you non-political, whilst your attitude towards the debate itself...." He pauses. "In my experience it is usually that by beginning from a recognition of the perhaps futility of the debate, and the points on both sides, that one then goes on to disbelieve in the proper foundation for their mutual co-existence. Many people have seen them as enemies, but many people also have seen them as much more than friends. The idea that the debate has no firm reality betrays the History of the debate itself, it has its origins, and they are firm enough, firm enough to serve as grounds for law, firm enough to kill over, and in more recent times men have thought and believed that the injustices of this history have been clear enough, and the Truth of the real relationship firm, and real enough, to die over!"
"I guess I believe we are all born with some rights, and maybe that our parents, or somebody has the duty to take care of us until we can take care of ourselves, but thats just biology. I certainly don't think that we could be born with duties too, that just wouldn't make any sense, so what kind of a firm basis for the relationship could there be, if its dependent upon my actions wherther i have duties or not, and my actions are totaly relative, they're just biology too."
"Exactly, we are born with our biology, we have a right to it. But isn't part of that biology that we eat, and sleep, don't we have a right to do these things!?" The man once again grew manic as he came closser to tasting some thought that was clearly and explicitly already on the tip of his tongue. "Yet people tell us that we have to earn our food, that we have no right to it, but that they infact have the right, or some even dare to call it a duty, to tell us what we have to do, in order to earn our food, which science will confirm, biology has provided for us, without the slightest thought of duties, or rights itself. Those men, who claim it as their duty to oversee us, they have their possition supported firmly enough, that much is for sure. And yet when we seek a foundation for rights and duties to be properly wed upon, we shrug, and give up, when common sense mixed with a remedial knowledge of science already see us clear beyond what travesty currently stands in the place of the True foundation of society."
"And what is that?" He asked, now slightly interested.

08:56 pm: break in to some bbbbbbetter symbols or stay the same
dark loops of envy bubbles in ice cubes air and squeeze them out close to he edge you figure out youre not surprised you wear your sweater just the same

03:47 pm: okocim
out from the eagles shape, draws in the moistures wake, the cool parttaking of the sky, and the shadow layed out, cast away from self, deeply sent out down and wide, calling out un noticed, passing across the same earth where upon, we lay drunk and broken, overtaking something of the earth, we look up to see it swooping, as we feel as it through radiance passing, its shadow upon the earth